menu_bld.gif (887 bytes)

Vital Signs Project: A Tale of Two Houses

(Background) (Hypotheses) (Methodology) (Analysis) (Conclusion) (References).

Methodology of the Investigation

To test these hypotheses this investigation employed a case study approach. This approach involves the intense observation of each single case (dwelling or unit of analysis) separately. The purpose is to analyze the phenomena that constitutes the life cycle of each "unit" with the aim of establishing generalizations about the population to which the unit belongs (Cohen & Manion, 1994). Both quantitative and qualitative methods of gathering data were used. These included:

1. Recording the buildings' thermal performance for one week during the month of August, 1996 (Note that this limitation is due to the researchers limited stay in Cairo, Egypt). This was achieved by programming a set of temperature and relative humidity "HOBO" dataloggers located inside and outside the houses and in different indoor spaces.

2. Group Interviews, which were usually informal in nature and carried out with the entire family occupying the dwelling unit.

3. Intensive formal interviews with architects and designers who were involved in the design and/or supervision of these houses (since Hassan Fathy and Ali Nassar are dead, interviews was conducted with some of their apprentices and students who worked with them during the design of the studied houses).

4. Personal formal interviews with some of the house occupants and Users (e.g. House Porter, Cleaners, etc.).

5. Photography and field notes were employed to support the data collected and played a positive role in documenting both physical traces and human behavior. Both of these instruments were supplemental and they added a visual and written documentation to the investigator observations.

The Settings of the Investigation

After a careful archival survey of the private houses designed and built by Hassan Fathy (see Richards et al., 1986), Mit Rehan was selected as an example. The criteria for the selection was based on: (1) being moderate in size, (2) a single family residence, (3) composed of two residential floors which helps in testing temperature fluctuation in the indoor volume, (4) containing rich traditional architectural elements, and (5) could be accessible to the investigator during the short visit to Cairo. After the researcher was granted access to the Mit Rehan facility, a modern contemporary villa was chosen for the comparative analysis based on the similarity of its size and floor area to Mit Rehan. The two settings are described below.

Cairo Villa

Figure 4a: Cairo Villa - Main Living Area with dining room in the background. (39K JPEG)

This medium single family dwelling was designed and built in 1961-1962 and took more than a year for the completion of its construction. The house was built for a government official and his family. It is composed of two separate floors designed as two apartment houses. Reinforced concrete skeleton and common brick in-fill comprised the main building material used for the house. Contrary Mit Rehan (following paragraph) the house has a small thermal mass (1/3 of Mit Rehan's thermal mass). To minimize heat loss and gains from the roof, an 80 mm heat insulation (foam core) is used to insulate the concrete roof from direct solar heat gains. Urban planning guidelines resulted in narrow setbacks between the house and the surrounding neighbors. This helped create a micro-climate effect that reduced solar heating of the north and west facades.

Figure 4b: Cairo Villa - Exterior View. (39K JPEG)

Figure 4c: Cairo Villa - Interior View. (39K JPEG)


Mit Rehan

Figure 5a: Mit Rehan - Courtyard View. (39K JPEG)

The house was designed and constructed in 1980-1981 for the Kazroni family. It is located on the Sakkar road, outside Cairo, Egypt. This is considered the most stately domed and vaulted house designed and built by Hassan Fathy. The house is built with limestone. The project required 272 building days and was supervised by a young man of the owner's family. The house is also characterized by its massive solid walls (500 mm thick) and its reliance on a large thermal mass to provide sufficient protection against the harsh hot and dry weather of the region. The house is located in the middle of a vast garden, thus limiting the microclimate and shading effects supplied by neighboring facilities. The use of local materials and lattice wood work resulted in an aesthetically pleasing architecture that relied mainly on primitive human resources and common building technologies.

Figure 5b: Mit Rehan - View inside den. (39K JPEG)

Figure 5c: Mit Rehan - Exterior View. (39K JPEG)


Figure 6a: Cairo Villa - Ground floor plan. (65K JPEG)

Figure 6b: Cairo Villa - Front Elevation. (39K JPEG)

Figure 7a: Mit Rehan - Floor Plan. (65K JPEG)

Figure 7b: Mit Rehan - Building Section. (26K JPEG)


Table 2: Vital Statistics For The Two Houses Compared


Cairo Villa Mit Rehan
Bldg. Type Contemporary Neo-Traditional
Const. Type Beam & Column Bearing Wall
Ground Fl. Area 200 Sq. M. 242 Sq. M.
Ground Fl. Terrace Area 45 Sq. M. 170 Sq. M.
Total Ground Fl. Area 245 Sq. M. 412 Sq. M.
1st Fl. Area 220 Sq. M. 110 Sq. M.
1st Fl. Terrace Area 40 Sq. M. 65 Sq. M.
1st Ground Fl. Area 260 Sq. M. 175 Sq. M.
Total Area 505 Sq. M. 587 Sq. M.
Wall Area 420 Sq. M. 550 Sq. M.
Window Area 90 Sq. M. 70 Sq. M.
Masonry Type Red Brick Sandstone
Masonry Ground Fl. 42 Cu. M. 518 Cu. M.
Masonry 1st Fl. 50 Cu. M. 70 Cu. M.
Total Masonry 92 Cu. M. 588 Cu. M.
Concrete Type Reinforced Ordinary/light reinf.
Concrete Ground Fl. 71 Cu. M. 70 Cu. M.
Concrete 1st Fl. 60 Cu. M. 18 Cu. M.
Total Concrete 131 Cu. M. 88 Cu. M.
Thermal Storage Mass 941 kJ/deg K/Sq M 3,012 kJ/deg K/Sq M
U of Roofs and Floors 0.48 w/Sq M/deg K 1.91 w/Sq M/deg K
U of Walls 1.73 w/Sq M/deg K 1.15 w/Sq M/deg K
U of Roofs and Floors 5.36 w/Sq M/deg K 4.76 w/Sq M/deg K
Building UA 1,574 w/deg K 2763 w/deg K
Ubldg 3.12 w/deg K/Sq M 4.71 w/deg K/Sq M
Pct. Void/T-Area 21% 20%

Comments to author: vitalsigns@
ced.berkeley.edu

All contents copyright (C) 1998. Vital Signs Project. All rights reserved.

Created: 03/17/96
Revised: 09/09/02

PREVHOMENEXT

VITAL SIGNS
http://www-archfp.ced.berkeley.edu/vitalsigns/workup/two_houses/rwo_method.html