| Abstract:
Lighting in museums and art galleries must
serve two major functions. Exhibit spaces should allow the visitor an
atmosphere of relatively pure visual perception for viewing the art while
at the same time preventing damage to the artwork from unacceptably high
levels of light. Gallery spaces require different levels of lighting
depending on the type of exhibit displayed. For example, a temporary
exhibit of bronze sculpture might be allowed to receive more light than a
permanent collection of nineteenth century oil paintings, such as that of
The Frye Art Museum.
This study attempted to evaluate the
effectiveness of the integration of natural and artificial light by both
scientific measurement, using light meters, and empirical judgments, based
on visits to the museum. Helpful information was also derived from
interviews given by building occupants as well as the architects at Olsen/Sundberg
in Seattle.
The result shows that the Frye Art Museum
has relatively lower light levels when compared to other museums we
visited in the region, even in the clerestory gallery, with the highest
recorded levels. The measured levels of natural lighting were not intense
enough to be of any great concern. However, the darker spaces at the Frye
is found to be a pleasant change from comparable galleries, at least in an
empirical sense, that the general ambiance is enhanced. Lower foot-candle
levels seemed to promote a more contemplative environment for viewing art.
|